what are ur views on american muscle's and honda's? 1967 Shelby GT-500-Integra type R Dc2? Mustang Boss-Honda civic type R ep3? ect u get the pic
Honda Simply because they are more reliable and in my opinion look much better. Also would be the price..You would pick up a Honda cheaper than most american cars. They may have bigger engines but japs handling would be better Just my opinion but I suppose that there will always be a disagreement
american muscle or Honda thanks 4 the comment yea thts what i love old american but i do also like honda's ......... u da bie tht drives round lurgan in green polo yea?
I am almost Honda through and through BUT a DC2 vs a 67 Shelby Mustang Perhaps your comparison charts are out of date, but the value alone on the two cars differs by around 100,000 pounds. 67 Mustang, whether a GT500, 350 or just a nice fastback every day of the week over a DC2
thanks 4 the comments lads yea i like hondas but i prefer muscle much better looking, yes the price range of the 2 makes are way off the extra money is well worth it
Dontforget that they may have 10l V15's, but you'd be sure they'd still only put out 250 bhp and weigh about 3 ton
are we comparing apples with err pom de terr'es. having owned an ep3 type r from new for 3 years i would say it was probably the best value for money car ive ever had. but having been out in my mates blown 725rwhp 67 manual with detroit locker, not much compares to stupid sh*t your pants dangerousness.
aye that'd would be me. or used to be me seeing as it's off the road for a rebuilt. Who are you? sheamy?
ben, glad we can count on your for valid input Why the **** would anyone choose a rusty kit kat wrapper of a honda when they have a 67 fastback No comparison either in looks, noise or ermmm, looks or ermm, noise. But then the mustang is a proper classic in my eyes.
nah man im dale . . . im mates wiv dee mc convilles wee bro dez . . . . . . i knw wheaten nal even if e is a homo
Unless you want to be chastised and just be know and Drift_, i suggest you drop the text speak as its not well looked upon here
Hows it coming on?? Did you see the drawing I did on the thread about needing pics of cars? Not the best but atleast i tried
sorry about the text language guys i was just texted about it . . .im new to the forums and im useing my psp to reply at the minute hehe so its quite hard
I'd rather poke my eyes out than own either. Plus why the one sided poll? Why not jap vs muscle? Why just honda? Honda - You only think they are fast until you get a drive in a proper fast car. If any other manufacture made a car that revved to 8500, it'd have a lot more bhp and more torque - Vtak sucks. Yank Tanks - 500000000000000cc, yet not very fast and can't go round corners.
there are times i would agree Good point, however, i believe it is down to the fact he likes both Hondas and Yank Tanks. Might have picked that up a few posts up ^^^ Agreed, they are quick for what they are, but by no means are they "fast cars" Would have to disagree with the latter half of that statement though. Toyota, perhaps have done so with the NZR-halfthealphabet 1.6 engine, but its not the worlds most reliable engine. Ford and Vauxhall wont produce them, not due to lack of technology but down to the fact their engine design and build just isnt up to scratch. As ford required a turbo to produce 130hp from the RST, Honda were producing 150+ from the B16 in the CRX and it handled infinitely better. Before you begin in a responding arguement make sure it is relative but still, the noise is just epic
Ive test drove a few hondas and hated every one. The S2000 agnews let me drive had a roof like a nervous priest in Antrims serious crime unit and rattled too much. Put me off for life and the lenght of time the V tec took to actually excite me was measured in hair growth and not seconds as it should be. The missus has a 2.2 civic oil burner that is a great car considering she does 100 miles a day to and from work. I just dont get the V tec as a daily driver. Totally useless. American musckles for moi
The 2.2 CTDI's are fantastic cars although, without sounding like a fanboy, the vtec unit concept was an ideal design for daily use. below 5k you have a wee shopping car, run about town, not overly quick, and returns fairly good mileage for fuel useage. then the weekend comes, you nick the keys off the missus (make sure the oil is topped up) and go for a razz. Admittedly it is a totally different way of driving to most NA and turbo'd cars as you must rely on revs as opposed to torque, as such some people find this doesnt suit them at all. Much in the same way i cant bring myself to own a ford despite how many good models they have made over the years, i just cant do it. Something about them just slaps me in the face and shouts wise the **** up